Funny how we can be so similar to the past. I have spoken a few times at Village meetings regarding the water and sewer rate increases the village saw, and will once again see, with the coming construction of new well #5. Having watched the first episode of "The American Revolution" I find myself not as enamored with the founding fathers as I once was. Two issues, beyond the slavery issue of many, made me question their motives. First, is the idea that the war was not so much about the principles of freedom and liberty as about land, which jogged my memory of a book I read a few years ago. Second, the episode made me wonder if the colonists did not like some of the actions imposed on them because they were sponges. In this sense, they relate to my comments on McFarland Utility bill increases. This post ties both the land speculation and then about whether the colonies sponged off the home nation as the surrounding towns sponge off McFarland.
Land
One historian quoted in the episode commented that the Revolutionary War was essentially about land rather than the principles of liberty and freedom, or really taxation without representation. He noted that many of the founding father's were large land speculators including George Washington, John Hancock, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin. Land speculation was in jeopardy after the French and Indian War because the Brits banned colonists from settling west of the Appalachian Mountains. This was not due to keeping the Native Americans in their home territory, but rather over the cost to maintain peace in the dispersed settlements due to the likelihood of further conflict with Native Americans. The Crown simply recognized it was too costly to provide safety to such dispersed frontiersmen. Certain colonial leaders did not like not being able to obtain, speculate and profit off the sale of land west of the mountains. This jogged my memory of a book I read which intimated this was one of the causes of the Revolutionary War. Follow the money is a phrase today, but it seems it was also applicable more than 250 years ago.
 |
| Thomas Jefferson, Wikipedia |
Jefferson was a large speculator throughout his life, which was contrary to many of his public speeches in which he praised small farmers and the agrarian way of life. Evidence comes from the book Mr Jefferson's Lost Cause, authored by Roger Kennedy who noted that Jefferson and his neighbors were large land owners. He went on to say that Jefferson received 2,650 acres from his mother in 1757, and by 1782 his farm had grown to 4,125 acres, with over 200 slaves. One neighbor farmed 7,500 acres and another 9,700. Well, lets be real, they did not farm themselves as they were the Gentlemen Planters who employed many slaves to do the dirty work. Further, Kennedy reported that Jefferson's kinfolk in another Virginia county, the Cole's, "assembled 15,000 acres into one vast land imperium." However, the kicker is that Kennedy reports that "All of them, Jefferson included, planted in the east and speculated in the west." Jefferson's father was also a land speculator with involvement in the Greenbrier Company, a satellite of the Loyal Company, and Jefferson kept in contact and did business with one of his father's partners (see p 64). On the following page Kennedy goes on to say that "Speculation in Western land led many planters into rebellion against a British government that had twice sought to cut them off from the West." As noted, the show jogged my memory of this aspect. Was the cry "Give Me liberty or give me death", really a euphemism for "Give me land and money?"
Another proximate cause to the Revolution was the Quebec Acts, which instituted certain civil liberties in French and Catholic Quebec, in order to assimilate the province into the British Empire. Many of the Colonial leaders, the documentary reports, were against the Quebec Act, possibly due to dealing with the French Catholics. There was but one Catholic who signed the Declaration of Independence. A student of history, or the National Treasure movie would note that man as being Charles Carrol. This of course, did not mean that the same persons would be against French assistance in the war, as it played to the dictum "an enemy of my enemy is my friend." The French assistance of the US Revolutionary War was a partial cause, due to incurred debt, for the French Revolution and the resulting Reign of Terror.
Sponges
While a good many of the acts passed by British Parliament to raise money due to debt incurred with the French and Indian War were intolerable, some may have been appropriate to fund a war that retained the colonies under British rule, which they preferred, which allowed the Anglophiles, slaves and all, to flourish. But, the colonies would have none of that. The Colonial government had established Safe Committees to watchdog against imports or exports to Britain. The PBS documentary noted that such committees and their actions were more intolerable and egregious than any act undertaken by parliament and imposed on the colonies. For the same group to desire liberty, and then to work against it, shows how the ends justified the means and principles could be easily set aside. The documentary did not note if any of the colonial leaders had heart burn over the hypocrisy. The colonies, it seems desired services, but did not wish to pay for them. In that sense they were sponging off others, in their case Britain. They not only wanted to land speculate west of the mountains, but they wanted the British to safeguard them and move the Native Americans out. They did not wish the Stamp Act to pay for colonial judges. Of the British colonies in the Americas, the documentary states that the Caribbean was really the economic power house, likely with its crops of sugar and rum produced slaves. Of the 13 colonies in North America, Virginia was the economic engine with its productivity. At this time, all of the colonies had some slaves, although southern states had much higher populations. At this time, Virginia's population was 40% slaves. Economics always matter.
 |
1770 Slaves in American Colonies, actual and percent of population Wikipedia |
This gets us to McFarland. I have spoken out a few times, to deaf ears, about how we village residents for property tax and ratepayers are subsidizing the towns in the area. Let me use two examples. First, early this year the village moved the Fire Protection Charge (FPC) from the village tax base to the utility district (water, and sewer collection). This near $500,000 shift caused rates to increase rather dramatically. (The tax shift was not used to lower property taxes but to put to fund new expenses.) The FPC essentially is a payment to the utility for the necessity of having to oversize facilities for fire protection. For example, hydrants, and storage (think water towers) fall partly into this. We ratepayers are now paying this charge. The towns are not in the utility and hence are not ratepayers. They benefit from this because hydrants and storage are used to fight fires in the rural area, and since fires double every 30-60 seconds, and it takes longer to get to a rural fire, more water is needed. And the water, due to no fire hydrants, has to come by tanker. More personnel and equipment is required. Yet, the only charge the towns served by McFarland pay is a bulk water rate. Second, they do not pay for upcharge in equipment, much less help share the capital, finance, and operating costs for the fire station. They did not even pay for the high capacity pump at the fire station to fill a tanker truck. Our utility rates will take another big jump for a $4.2 million well #5, and I am sure even though the towns will benefit by a new high capacity well, they will not pay. Heck, The water impact fee in the village is based on only a $1 million project and when depreciation is taken into account (by PSC rules), the payments are rather minuscule. One can see that largess is not just to towns but to new construction. (Some policy makers in the village wish to get rid of impact fees altogether, but their share of a new $500,000 home is rather minor, and I doubt they will sell for less, just make more profit for the developer.) Developers today are, in a way, similar to the land speculators among our founding fathers.
 |
| Simeon Goff, Rosters of Revolutionary War Service, Family Search |
Fire is only one aspect, most towns are served by the Dane County Sheriff whose budget is spread over the whole county, and the towns pay no more or less (unless the contract for additional protection), even though municipalities have their own police forces. Or, let us take a senior center, funded fully by the village, but used by the sponges in the rural area. They get lower taxes since they do not have to fund such services, and we the McFarland tax payer pay for their share. In the 250 years since the battle of Lexington and Concord (April 19, 1775) just as the colonists were sponges, so too are many towns in Dane County. They sponge off the services and goodwill of the neighboring municipality. Small municipalities may sponge off Madison, using certain Madison services, but not paying property taxes for such service. One example, is the Overture center, in which the city of Madison is contributing over $2 million in 2025, but yet, I am not aware that a city of Madison resident gets a reduced ticket price. There are many other ways urban areas subsidize rural areas such as electricity and internet. It is much cheaper to lay such lines in an urban area, since there is a lineal cost per foot, but we subsize the long line construction in the rural area. I pay the same price as for internet as a rural home that required perhaps a couple thousand more feet of fiber than I required.
 |
Wife's 4th Great Grandfather, in Muster Roll Family search
|
The Nine Springs Sewer Treatment Plant is required by state law to allow sewer trucks (Honey Wagons) to dump at the plant, but only are allowed to charge actual cost. Well, even though I have been pressing for 33 years, they have yet to charge the millions of dollars spent in the headworks facility to handle the truck discharge of the waste they haul. They should pay the capital and debt cost for such a facility and not have it continued to be born by the MMSD ratepayers.
 |
McFarland Public Safety Building 2025, Bray Architects
|
Many like to be a sponge and being so was not unique. Simeon Goff, my wife's fourth great grandfather, a patriot, whose first tour of duty in the Revolutionary War started nine days after Lexington and Concord was the opposite of Thomas Jefferson. A small Massachusetts farmer, he probably was part of the movement that spread over Massachusetts for the ideals of liberty and freedom, and likely knew nothing about the land speculators among the founding fathers at the Continental Congress. We see sponges today, particularly by rural landowners in Dane County who sponge off the largess of a nearby municipality. As I was told in answer to my query about getting the towns to pay their fair share for capital and operating expenses: "But, that is the way it has always been done." Well, that is not a good answer. The problem with the nation as a whole is most everybody wants services, but they do not wish to pay for them.
Some say to study history because it repeats itself, perhaps not exactly, but in tone. Looking at the land speculation aspect, allows one to question the overall movement toward the war that started in April 1775. Were the ideals and principles of "Live Free or Die", Liberty, or Freedom, secondary to land speculation? Then we get to the colonial sponges and can compare them to the town sponges who receive service from McFarland. The inchoate nation 250 years past was perhaps in a land of sponges, but it soon was on its way to becoming an economic powerhouse. The founding fathers, as flawed as they may have been with mixed messaging of land and sponges, still had some great ideas.
Sources: 2025 "The American Revolution: In Order to be Free," Episode 1 of 6, Ken Burns et al, PBS
2003 Kennedy, Roger G, Mr. Jefferson's Lost Cause: Land Farmers, Slavery and the Louisiana Purchase, Oxford University Press, NY NY.