Monday, December 29, 2025

The Package

There was an item I was purchasing as a Christmas gift and the closest location for in-person acquisition was in Brookfield, WI. Due to this, I decided to order it from that retailer online and pay the shipping cost. This began the fiasco of a package purchase and its delivery from its source of origin to my home in McFarland, WI.

Upon placing the order on Dec 10, I was quite pleased that it was scheduled to arrive on Saturday, December 13. Some packages take weeks from date of order. The package, from the USPS tracking code, originated in a Minneapolis suburb, and hence, they allocated just a couple days of shipping. My wife has ordered some items, before I placed this order, and they are not due until, disappointingly, after Christmas. This time of year, or maybe any time of year, you never know what you will get when it comes to package delivery.

Well, my package did not arrive Saturday as predicted, but I figured it would arrive Monday. Monday delivery, for the US Postal Service, came and went. I then did the tracking option and found that the package was in Sharon, WI. Sharon is located in Walworth County with its southern border being the Wisconsin--Illinois State Line. This small community may even have some Bear fans, not that it matters. For some reason, when going to Illinois, I think of the quote of Henry Jones, Sr to his son Indiana (Henry, Jr) when in Berlin and watching a Nazi rally: "My boy, we are pilgrims in an unholy land."

Madison's main PO, Milwaukee St

That evening my pilgrimage to trouble shoot the whereabouts of the package began. In a bizarre situation, the tracking had it from the post office of origin west of the big city of Minneapolis, to its twin city to the east. It then went to Madison. Now, in all the same day it showed it in Sharon, then McFarland and 15 minutes later back in Sharon. Overly, confusing, but I was delighted to know that the post office had figured out the space-time continuum, maybe using Doc Brown's old DeLorean. But, with what happened, as you patient readers will find out, it made me wonder if the flux capacitor had failed.

Setting aside the space-time continuum and doc Brown's flux capacitor, I checked my order to assure I had the correct address and zip code. It was all correct. I then called the company who I asked if they could verify that they used the correct address and zip. (I started with the company because I figured there were few places in the world that could compete for complexity of bureaucracy with the USPS, one being the DMV, and the other being the Catholic Church.)  I was put on hold, and the call was cancelled. I called back and was told they had used the correct address and zip code, and that perhaps there was a forwarding address. They were following the PO tracker which said if an item is in the wrong location either the zip code is wrong or there was a forwarding address. The PO apparently never calculated that there would be a failure on their end. We never have set up a forwarding address. We had received other mail that day, but it made me wonder had someone put a forwarding address using our address. 
V of Sharon, Walworth County, WI

I then called the PO and was connected through a series of contacts to report a missing package. Concerning to me was that the PO auto call told me the package had been delivered to an address in Sharon, WI at 9:15 that morning. Given this, I placed a lost package request, which information I had to receive by text. Lucky, my mother-in-law did not have to handle this as she would scream discrimination for old people and people that do use text messaging. I placed the lost package request. However, being concerned with the suggestion of a forward order and that it was said to be delivered, I ventured to the Madison main PO. Being 19th in line, I was somewhat surprised at the efficiency of the two, then three, clerks who handled the packages, stamp purchases, and the like. I put my issue to the clerk and to my surprise she said they they lacked jurisdiction over the package. This surprised me because all of McFarland's mail goes through there and sometimes carriers pick up their mail at that location. She did check the tracking number and had more information available to her than I did, and said, "Oh, it was mis-shipped." She could not tell me anything about a devious forwarding order. I went home, and figured I would go to the McFarland PO on Tuesday when it opened at 8:30 am. 
McFarland PO, Long St

Just after 8 am Tuesday I got a call from the McFarland PO. We discussed the package and the postal representative said, yes, it was in, or had been in Sharon, and it was on a truck for delivery, but a carrier caught the odd address and realized the wrong zip code and so sent it back to Madison. I figured that 9:15 am delivery in the auto call was probably the time the package was on the truck. I suppose the post office figures if a package is out for delivery it gets delivered. The McFarland PO rep said it could well be back in McFarland, but he did not have time to sort through all the packages in the back, so he suggested to wait to see if it was delivered on Tuesday or Wednesday. The  package arrived that day. I was surprised at the quick attention to the matter by getting a call from the McFarland PO right after 8 am.

What surprised me is that with all the scanning and reading equipment, and a label generated by a MN PO that it got to the wrong location and it took a human to catch what was likely a mechanical error, although I suppose it could be human error. Sharon's (village of) zip code is 53585, and McFarland's is 53558. Some equipment, or person showed some dyslexia, but I get that it can be easy to confuse the two zip codes. I guess the post office has yet to solve the space time continuum, but I am happy to know that the package arrived a day after having been pulled off a truck in Sharon, WI. Kudos to the USPS for attention to this package at a time when I am sure they are swamped with packages.  

Monday, December 22, 2025

The Packer Rule

This past Saturday night the Green Bay Packers played the Chicago Bears in prime time with kickoff at 7:20 pm. I watched much of the game, but with the Da Bears down by seven points with 1:59 remaining, I decided to go bed. The Bears had just made a field goal. I set aside my cardinal rule, which is: No, and I mean no, Packer lead is ever safe. Sure enough, we turned on the news when we got up Sunday morning, and heard that the Packers had lost. Another Packer meltdown. It was at this point that my wife reminded me of my cardinal rule regarding the Packers. 

I am not sure why I broke my cardinal rule about the Packers, perhaps because I was tired. Or, my wife was already in bed asleep, and I wonder if I would have woken her up with a minor reaction to the pathetic play of the Packers. She can hear squirrels on the roof, so my change in breathing and blood pressure in reaction to yet another Matt LaFailure situation would likely have woken her up.

Romeo Doubs mishandling the On-side Kick

Listening to the news, weather and sports Monday morning, so over a day later, the sports person referred to it as a "collapse of epic proportions." If a Packer d lineman had not grabbed the Bear QB facemask on a third and twenty, giving them 15 yards plus an automatic first down late in the 4th quarter, this scenario would likely never have happened. if they had scored on one of their several trips in the redzone, this may not have occurred. If a fumbled snap had not occurred late in the game, this may not have occurred. The thing is people like to point to one play, the botched on-side kick, but there were several other key plays that failed too. It could be a play early in the game. For example, the Packer coach not going for a field goal, but trying for a first down. Or, in my mind, the lack of touchdowns in the redzone. The Packers were more likely to score a TD beyond the twenty than inside the twenty. It is not like the Bears have a great defense, so yet again the team played down to its competition. Or, the Pack is so bad, the Bears played down to their competition. 

Hats off to Da Bears, who have so far come back to win six games they were losing after the two minute warning. This is the most of that type of victory since the merger of the AFL and NFL  in 1970. Yes, they keep such statistics. The Packers had a ten point lead just before the two minute warning when Chicago kicked a field goal to pull within seven. 

Player circled in red caught the game tying TD 
with less than 25 seconds in the fourth quarter
Coverage error by the Packer Defense

Even Artificial Intelligence commented on the seeming desire for the Packers to lose games in the final quarter, if not final minutes of a game. This year they collapsed in week 3 to Cleveland with less than 10 minutes to go, but the heartbreaker had to be the Bear loss. Packer meltdowns are notable. Years ago they were beating Philadelphia in Philly and Philly came back to win after getting a first down on a fourth and 26, yes a fourth and over a quarter of the field for a first down, and the vaunted Packer defense gave them a first down to let them go on and win the game. I think that is when I created my cardinal rule regarding the Packers.

Replay view of same play as above

The Monday morning WI State Journal, referred to the collapse as "Error after error in critical moments led to collapse en route to a 22-16 overtime loss to the Chicago Bears at Solider Field." The Packers held a ten point lead with about 4 minutes left in the fourth quarter. As I have said, no Packer lead is safe.

Chicago Bear DJ Moore making game winning 
47 yd TD pass, catching it in end zone.

The Packers with five losses are on the brink of missing the playoffs. They are fortunate that my sister's least favorite pro football player, Aaron Rodgers and the Pittsburgh Steelers beat the Lions on Sunday. In four of the five losses Green Bay led by 10, 3, 9, and 10 points. In the one tie they led by 13. The losses to Cleveland and the Bears were ten point leads with four minutes left in the final quarter. The loss to the Bears, one commentator said, was a "comedy of self-inflicted errors." The ability for the Packers to lose games in the fourth quarter is not just a fluke.  

In OT, Fourth down and 1, mis-snap, failed to get 
first down. The Bears then scored on their subsequent drive

I believe the situation goes back to coaching on several fronts. First, the coach has not instilled sufficient discipline, second, they lack the ability to close out a game, sometimes due to the coach getting too conservative (and now has gone the other way, perhaps in some situations), the inability of the coaching staff to prepare players for the second half. It is almost like Matt LaFailure does not expect the other team to make adjustments. It is also on the players on their inability to play a full four quarters and perhaps get comfortable with a small lead, and allow their minds to wander. 

The Packers used to be good at home, but Matt LaFailure has denigrated that record losing two home games to so-so teams this year. They have Baltimore up at home next, and I dread how Matt LaFailure will handle that game. His record as Packer coach is pretty good with a .665 winning percentage, but he is 3-5 in playoff games. Compare that to Vince, who was .754 winning percentage and was 9-1 in playoff games. Matt is no Vince. The game has changed, but it is much more offensive friendly than it was in the 1960's. 

Matt has trouble in the red zone (20 to goal line) going 0-5 against the Bears. This is not new, in a playoff game that sent Tampa Bay to the Super Bowl, the Packers had the ball with a fresh set of downs inside the five yard line and could not score. 

Yet, the comparisons to when Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers won Super Bowls in seasons when they turn 27 years old are still being made, with one guy saying the 2020 Packers lost a comparable situated game.

Packer Head Coach reacting to bad snap exchange (above)

The Bear loss was reminiscent of the Packer 2014 playoff loss in Seattle, where the Packers flubbed getting the on-side kick. The tight end who went against protocol to block the kicking team guy to allow the player behind to get the ball, was released the following day. I am not sure why this franchise is so prone to pathetic losses. It is as if they have rigged the game to be the lackey to the favored Roger Goodell team. The thing is, it was the Bears, who until this year, were a team that succumb to losses in the fourth quarter. Now they have found a way to pull themselves out. The question that the front office and the coaches need to answer is why the team is so prone to seal their own fate This is a franchise where no lead is safe, at any point in the game when they are playing. 




Wednesday, December 17, 2025

Agricultural Congruence, the Old World

When our boys were young we often went to the Milwaukee Public Museum. During our visit we would walk through its European Village display, which provided a flavor of the varied cultural and ethnic groups of Europe. It helped me to imagine life in 19th century Europe. The lead designer and builder of that exhibit (and the more popular Streets of Old Milwaukee, among others at the museum) was Edward Hofmeister, who is my second cousin once removed. His grandmother was Marie Hovel, younger sister to my great grandfather, Martin Hovel. What struck me most, typical of such museum displays, was the darkness so common on the ersatz street and in the dwellings and structures into which we peered from behind the small fences. That darkness is a metaphor for the life the Havel (Hovel) family led in the backwater of Southwestern Bohemia. This would include Edward Hofmeister's grandmother who lived in the old country for the formative first thirteen years of her life. This post, which will be in two parts due to length, will focus on the Havel family in the old country and its congruence with economic and societal trends nearing almost three hundred years. 
Portion of the European Village, Milwaukee Public Museum
Source:  MPM.edu

For many immigrants to the US in the mid to late 19th century the old country retained a certain sense of charm and nostalgia, a simpler time outside of the rapid technological change and industrialization experienced in the Western world, in which America was becoming the power house over Britain. Growth in the US was fueled in large part by immigrant labor. It was a time of creative destruction, when new technologies led to new ways of doing things and occupations and methods went to the wayside or had to adjust; not unlike the world in which we live today. When times are difficult even trying times can become nostalgic as our brains filter out the bad; this gives us what is referred to as a rosy retrospection. This explains why the past has a certain draw, and why the European Village and the Streets of Old Milwaukee were so popular. It was a time many never knew, but grew up with it being romanticized.

Stabile Cadastre Map, of Ratiborova Lhota, 1826
Was known at the time by German name, Melhutka

Between 1800 and 1900 it is estimated that 19 to 20 million Europeans immigrated to the United States, with the later wave focused on those from Central and Southern Europe. My Hovel line was among those who emigrated from Bohemia. Bohemia was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire at the time and was in Central Europe. It is difficult to know numbers from Bohemia because the way they were entered on a ship manifest varied, although the Havel family was identified as from Bohemia, as all on the manifest page. The ten Havel family members did not even register as a blip within the larger immigration picture. With eight children, the family, in my opinion, looked for better economic options for their children. Not all immigrants stayed, many returned to Europe, homesick, or found that life was not as green across the ocean as expected. (It is estimated that between 1850 and 1913 up to one-third of immigrants returned to their home country.) The State of Wisconsin advertised and had arrangements with varied agents to draw immigrants to the state. My Hovel ancestors realized economic opportunity in America, in the same field (pun)--farming as in the old country. The Library of Congress indicates that even with the substantial industrialization in the US in the later 19th century, "The United States began as a largely rural nation, with most people living on farms or in small towns and villages. While the rural population continued to grow in the late 1800s, the urban population was growing much more rapidly. Still, a majority of Americans lived in rural areas in 1900." (note 1) The old country was different; it is estimated that in 1869 over 80% of the population in southern Bohemia was rural. During the period of 1870 to 1930 the population of southern Bohemia actually declined. (note 2)

Present day Ratiborova Lhota

My Havel ancestors were peasant serfs until 1848, when serfdom ended in the old country and they were freed from such status and provision of free labor to the domain. Well, the revolt occurred in 1848, and in March 1849 the patent was issued dissolving serfdom. Being peasant serfs, they had certain obligations to their Domain. Beginning in 1680, the ruling Hapsburgs found that the thumb of the varied domains on peasants was strong and that this led to reduced economic growth. Bohemia in particular experienced what is known as the Second Serfdom, and this era is said to run from about the mid 1500's until late in18th century. My documentation of the Havel family in the old country goes from 1585 to immigration in 1868, so generally covers this era. The Second Serfdom involved increased labor service, rents, restrictions on what a peasant could and could not do (permission for a trade, to get married as two examples). Hence, the Royal Patents or decrees tried to lessen the hold of the domain on the serfs. Most often the domains found ways around the move to lessen their grip, or simply ignored it. Empress Maria Theresa, the lead reformer, commented: "The peasants were pushed to the extreme by the excesses of the seigneurs. Those gentlemen have known how to arrange things in such a manner that there was no way of seeing them clearly, and the subjects were always under the same oppression." (note 3) This was the situation for my Havel ancestors in the old country, nine known generations (1585-1848/49) under the heavy hand of a domain (Krumlov and Netolice).


Paternal Trees, Thomas (author) to his 6th great grandfather, Simon

It was in 1846, two years before the end of serfdom, that Josef Havel, my 2nd great grandfather, bought the family farm from his father, Frantisek. He paid 860 Convention Munze currency for the farm. It was also the year that he was married at almost 38 years of age to Anna Jodl. Anna married Josef on her 23rd birthday. The total area purchased would equal 41.6 acres, which included 24.67 acres of arable land, 6.97 acres of forest land, 11.16 acres of meadow land, pasture at 1.8 acres, and a garden at 1 acre. Josef had to purchase the tenancy rights for the farm from his father, and then buy out the domain's rights following freedom from serfdom in 1848/1849. The direct line Havel farm at this time was in Dolni Chrastany, a small village in the Netolice Dominion of southwest Bohemia. In the foothills of the mountains, the soils were generally poor. Meadow land was located near streams and wetland, so as to protect crops from flooding. Forest land was on steep slopes. 
Portion of Dolni Chrastany Parcel Maps

The land holdings, were generally long and linear. Some have attributed this to the wood plow which was difficult to turn, but the long linear parcels are not only related to the arable land. The second, and what I find the most plausible explanation, was that dividing the land length wise was, at the time it was accomplished, considered the most equitable method of division. 


Portion of Dolni Chrastany Parcel Map

At the time of the Havel "ownership" of the Ratiborova Lhota farm (#15 Lhota was "owned" by the Havel family since at least 1585) and the Dolni Chrastany farm, land division was not allowed. The farm was often sold to the youngest son, or daughter, who was generally at an age able to take on the farm and the father and mother would retire to the outer house, on the property. It was a smaller dwelling generally separate from the main house, at the other side of the courtyard. Their version of today's mother-in-law cottage. This was the case in Dolni, and Lhota. In some cases, but not often, the youngest did not wish the farm, was too young at time of retirement of the parent, or was disabled in some manner and the farm would pass to another sibling. That left the older siblings to find a farm, as some, like Frantisek (Josef's father) did in his marriage to Teresia Jiral.

Parcels by Ratiborova Lhota, Indication Sketch of Stabile Cadastre
Mika, Johann now owns the Havel farm (#15), son of Marie Havel Mika

Essentially, with the end of serfdom in 1848, Josef would have had to make payment to the domain, in order to own the land outright. A domain continued to own the property until tenants could purchase their share. A footnote in the land register may explain the situation for Josef: 
According to the ruling dated 10th August 1851 extract No. 1885 and the table enclosed in the document collection, a Grundentlastungs-Kapital (compensatory payment related to the cessation of manorial rule) of 115fl 46x C.M. is hereby declared for the attention of the Bohemian Imperial and Royal Grundentlastungslandeskassa in I Satzpost against which, the holding owner is discharged from the following:
Wheat         --       62/4 maßel 
Rye             --        13 maßel  
Barley 1 metzen 6 2/4  maßel  
Oats    1  metzen    11 maßel

         Draft robot labor 156 days Ground rent 38¾x 

Dolni Chrastany was under the Netolice Dominion, we can see that Josef was required to provide, and in 1851, was formally released from, his service of 156 days of robot labor to the domain, and his required in-kind contributions of four grains. He paid over 156 fl CM to the Royal Treasury for his property right. This cessation of robot (free) labor would likely, in a practical matter, have occurred with the end of serfdom in 1848/1849. Yet, this is instructive as it shows the labor he and his father, Frantisek would have provided to the domain during their years of "ownership" which likely carried back to Teresa Jiral's father and then to prior holding "owners." Frantisek took on the holding upon marriage to Teresa Jiral whose father was deceased and had owned the farm.

Indication Sketch of Stabile Cadastre
Havel House #18 and related back garden
Red house number by home, black house number of garden

As to Josef's purchase of the farm, his marital contract explains why he was able to pay the farm off by late December 1846, or the year he married (married Anna Jodl on 27 Jan 1846). Anna Jodl's father provided a dowry of 1,000 fl CM which allowed Anna to be joint owner of the holding; relevant sections of the contract in this regard:
Second regarding marriage estate, the father of the bride pledges a dowry to the groom of. . . . . .       1000fl C.M. that is, one thousand Gulden, with 3 imperial-royal 20 Kreuzers counted to each Gulden, of which at the end of Shrovetide of the current year he is obliged to pay. . and one year from today. . . . . . . . .      .   800fl., 200fl., then, as an enhancement of the dowry, 1 cow immediately after the marriage ceremony, alongside two unshorn ewes following spring lambing season of the current year.

Third the groom accepts this dowry with gratitude, and in return he surrenders to the bride, as a bride-price, co-ownership of Dolní Chrášťany holding No. 18 which is subject to a purchase price value of 800fl.  

The contract is really egalitarian, providing Anna rights to manage the holding if Josef were to die, and allowing a child, regardless of sex, to takeover the holding: "Fifth the children born of this marriage, regardless of gender, shall enjoy a preferential right over the estate/holding ahead of children born of a subsequent marriage."  The marriage contract also allows for retirement provisions for Anna, and she received one cow upon her coming into the marriage.

Farming in the old country was undergoing changes due to the end of serfdom which changed labor conditions and forced the increase use of newer ideas. However, it is said many former peasants were reluctant to change. Likely being under the foot of the domain for so long made them wary of spending money for newer equipment. That is if they had capital to invest in new equipment. They used oxen to plow instead of horses because the domain would claim a good horse without compensation to the owner. Davis mentions that, in the more progressive areas, new plows, sowing, threshing and reaping equipment started to come on the scene, particularly from 1849 to 1859, but that during the 1860's the use of new equipment was perceptible. (p 497) 

Three Havel Parcels on Indication Sketch of Stabile Cadastre, Dolni Chrastany

Dolni Chrastany was located in the Sudetenland, and was purged of ethnic Germans following WWII, often in a rather brutal way as payback to the Nazis. The Havel family came to this farm via marriage of Josef's father, Frantisek to Teresa Jiral, whose father had died. The oldest sister would have inherited, but she was handicap and passed the rights of acquisition to Teresia. Teresia had only this one sister who appears to have survived at the time of the handover of the farm. By convention, if not rule, to run a farm required a husband and wife to be operated The domain could take away a farm that had been cultivated by their ancestors for generations if they found it performing poorly. Hence, why one sees a second marriage rather quickly after the death of a spouse. Generally, the distribution of labor had the husband take care of the tilled, forest and meadow land, and the large animals, while his wife took care of the garden, children, household and small animals, like chickens. 

A prior post mentioned Wenzel Fitzl having a tendency to marry widows. Marie Havel, is Josef's aunt and she married Wenzel after the death of her first husband Vaclav Mika. But, before marrying Marie Hovel, Wenzel married, Catherina Ruesmueller in 1774 four months after Catherina's husband Mathias passed away. Catherina and Mathias' youngest child was Teresia who would take on the farm after she married Frantisek Havel. Catherina died in 1793. Wenzel married Marie Havel Mika on 25 Oct 1796 (the same day Frantisek and Teresia married). The farm was held in trust, so to speak, by Wenzel for Teresia. I have not tracked Wenzel to see if he may have had any other nuptials. Wenzel was 15 years the junior of Catherina. Maria Havel was 15 years younger than Wenzl. The #18 Dolni holding came to the Jiral's via Mathias Jiral's marriage to Catherina Ruesmueller on 2 Jul 1760. Mathias was born at #3 Dolni, and the Jiral's came into possession of #3 when Mathias father Laurence took over his father-in-law, Jakob Ruesmuller's holding in 1716. This was four years after he married his wife Marianna Ruesmueller. The #18 Dolni farm came to the Havel family via marriage of Teresia Jiral and Frantisek Havel.

Frantisek had a "bride price" agreement dated 3 Nov 1796 to pay Wenzel Fitzl as the guardian of Teresia the following:
Second:  The groom shall bestow upon his future wife a dowry (rather bride price is intended) in the form of; in 
cash.................................... 150 Rhenish gulden 
four head of oxen...............110 Rhenish gulden 
two head of dairy cattle....... 30 Rhenish gulden  
Totaling...............................290 Rhenish gulden
The price of the farm was 140 Rhenish gulden (Rg), meaning Frantisek paid in cash 10 Rg more than the farm value. But yet, he also provided four oxen and two dairy cows whose value together equaled the price he paid for the farm. There is no mention of any robot service that Frantisek would take on in this agreement. Wenzel must have been quite the bargainer, because if both Frantisek and Teresia died without children he would receive the farm back. Frantisek made payments to Wenzel and to Teresia (his spouse) in 1798, and then payments to Wenzel from 1799 to 1813, with a payment missed in 1800 "on account of adverse weather (hail/storms)." Payments were not made in 1811 or 1812, perhaps because Frantisek was ahead of schedule; the register does not list the years much less a reason why. Josef would acquire the farm from Frantisek in January 1846, but the currency of sale would change, and it is difficult to compare the changes from Shock Meissen to the Conventions Munze.

Part of Frantisek "Bride Price" Agreement

The Schock Meissen value (SM) was a common unit off currency until 1796 when it changed to Rhenish Gulden, and then again by 1846 to Conventions Munze. Unless there were significant improvements, or disregard for a holding, the value at handover was usually the same as the prior handover. Looking at the below Table 1 you will see the value of the 28 Apr 1625 handover from Havel to Jakob was less than what Havel paid when he took over the family farm from his brother Bartos (this will be explained in the next post). Value of livestock and some other goods often equaled or exceeded the value of the farm holding. Please be bear in mind that they had a long term lease, not outright ownership, so this is a "lease" value, although the leases were commonly passed down within the family, as can be seen. Also, they had annual rent in both currency and in-kind contributions, in addition to other aspects of serfdom.

TABLE 1

Value of Holdings by Date of Sale
Complied by author from varied Land Register records
translated by Richard D'Amelio for author

Two contracts were involved with the union of Teresia and Frantisek. There was a bride price contract, or what Frantisek had to pay to marry Teresia covered above. The other was a handover contract of the farm from Teresia's step father Wenzel Fitzl to Teresia and Frantisek. Both are dated 3 Nov 1796. Some details of this agreement can be seen in Table 2, below.

Translation of side note in Land Register
Georg to son Simon

We know from the land register records that both Teresia and Frantisek were illiterate, even though compulsory education was dictated by Maria Therese in 1774, five years after Frantisek was born and two years after Teresia was born. Change came slowly to Southwest Bohemia, unless it meant benefit to the domain. Josef Havel was literate, although his wife Anna Jodl was not. However, Johann Jodl, Anna's father, who was born in 1786 was literate. We know this from the signatures on contract documents. Do not mistake illiteracy for not being able to function. These families must have known how to count, as they farmed and would have had to have varied coping mechanisms as to what field was planted in what crop and when. 

Side note in Land Register
Mathias (Sr) to son Mathias (Jr)

It is possible that the domains desired to retain an uneducated peasantry. It could also be that it took time for teachers to be found and schools to be constructed in rural Bohemia. What we do know is that life as a peasant under a domain was not easy, so it is possible that the family needed the labor of children, due to the heavy demand the family had for robot labor.. 
Start of Land Register Entry of Georg Havel sale to son Simon
Circled to left is the notation, "included in the valuation one old chest with lock--1fl"

The below Table 2, which I complied from varied land registers, shows the details of certain aspects of the sale of the holdings of three sales of the Lhota farm with the first in 1712 then two sales of the Dolni farm. This table provides a view into how little farming changed over time in livestock and methods and capability. In fact farming for Josef in 1867 was more like how his 5th great grandfather would farm than his descendants who farmed: his son, Martin, and grandson, Rudy, as explained in the earlier post.  The table shows to me how little they possessed when an old chest is mentioned in the record as being part of the estate handed down. It is a congruence with the history of agriculture and of socio-economic status of peasant serfs during the second serfdom and for sixty years after.

TABLE 2

Comparison Table of Items in varied Handover Contracts
Summarized from Land Register information

This post covered value of holdings, level of farming, and marital property agreements and joint ownership for Josef and Anna, and the marital property agreement for his father Frantisek's marriage to Teresia Jiral, the #18 Dolni holding heir, in which we had a brief review of how the holding came to the Havel family line from 1796 until sold by Josef in 1868. We touched on literacy and education, and the end of serfdom in 1848, and what it meant for Josef Havel, my second great grandfather. The next portion will focus on robot labor which was supposed to, but never seemed to decrease. It will also focus on secondary occupations and other aspects of life under the heavy hand of the second serfdom and how this is congruent with life in the Old World.

Bohemian Serfs harvesting in a field
Source: Labour Coercion, Serfdom in Bohemia

I am not sure if Edward Hofmeister ever visited the countries to obtain ideas for the dioramas he created for the European Village at the Milwaukee Public Museum. When that exhibit opened in 1979 the West and the East were in a Cold War and Bohemia, his grandmother's home country, was behind the Iron Curtain. The family had a habitat of recording they were from Germany, and a few times Austria, so Edward may not have known where the family originated. My Grandpa spoke German, and I recall my Dad saying he thought the Havel family originated from Germany as that was what Grandpa had said. I suspect that is how little they spoke of the old country, their focus was on the new country and fitting in with a new and markedly different way of life at the same time industrialization and technology was changing how farming, and life in general, was accomplished and lived. I also suspect that Bohemians, being Slavs, from the east, may have been more subject to ridicule and discrimination than Germans. While from Bohemia, the Germanic and Bohemian ethnicities became mixed being so close to the German border, and Dolni was in the Sudetenland. Although closer to the German border, Lhota was not part of the Sudetenland. The Havel family was of the world, and that is best seen in the congruence of how the family lived with the times in which they found themselves. 

Footnotes:
(1) https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/rise-of-industrial-america-1876-1900/rural-life-in-late-19th-century/

(2) LONG-TERM POPULATION DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOUTH BOHEMIAN MUNICIPALITIES FROM 1869 TO 2021 IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF SELECTED FACTORS Aleš Nováček*, Jan Kubeš*, Štěpán Klučka*

(3) Wright, William W. 1966. Serf, Seigneur and Sovereign: Agrarian Reform in Eighteenth Century Bohemia, University of Minnesota Press 

Davis, Katherine Benet, 1900 "The Modern Conditions of Agricultural Labor in Bohemia" Journal of Political Economy, Sept v8 #4, University of Chicago Press.

Other Sources:
Stabile Cadastre Maps from: ags.cuzk.gov/archive
Trebon Archive

Comment: Havel is often seen as Hawle, or Hawel. The German language V is pronounced like an F, but the W is pronounced like a V, hence the use of W for the name. German was the official language of the Hapsburg Empire.













Wednesday, December 10, 2025

Open Season

My spouse has been somewhat negligent on doing something to give me blog material, but she occasionally makes suggestions One suggestion she had last week involved an editorial cartoon in the Wisconsin State Journal with an eleven point buck talking to Wisconsin football head coach, Luke Fickell. The issue of football is larger than Luke Fickell and the deer in the bar. With the changes in college football there is an open season on coaches. 

On Saturday December 6, 2025 Indiana University defeated perennial power house THE Ohio State University in the Big Ten Championship game. OSU was ranked #1 in the nation and is the defending national champion, while Indiana was ranked #2. It was a close game, decided by a field goal. Curt Cignetti, the Indiana coach was hired in 2023 and has coached the Hoosiers for only two years. Until his arrival, the program had been mediocre at best having only three winning seasons in the past twenty years--7-6 in 2007; 8-5 in 2029 and 6-2 in 2020 (Covid). Cignetti was hired by Indiana from James Madison, a rather nondescript school. So far this year he is 13-0. Play will continue for the Hoosiers in the National Championship tournament which will have 12 teams, they are a #1 seed with a first round bye.

From WI State Journal, 3 Dec 2025

I am sure when Wisconsin's then new AD Chris McIntosh hired Luke Fickell away from Cincinnati, he had dreams of being where Indiana is today. Fickell had Cincinnati as a four seed for the National Championship in 2021, when the team undefeated until the playoff game, ending the season at 13-1. He was 9-3 in his last season with the Bearcats, before being hired by the UW. He was considered by many to be a candidate for the Notre Dame job which opened up with Brian Kelly's departure for LSU at the end of the 2021 regular season.  However, ND chose to go with Marcus Freeman, its then young defensive coordinator.

Many top tier coaching jobs opened during the season, Penn State, UCLA, LSU, among others. ESPN talking heads viewed the LSU job as the premier coaching position in the nation. While the talking heads were complaining about Lane Kiffin of Ole Miss leaving for LSU, and how he hung Ole Miss out to dry for the upcoming playoffs, they were dissing Penn State for what they thought was too long of a search. The Penn State search ended this past week by their hire of Dan Campbell from Iowa State. Penn State had been spurned by at least one candidate, if not more. The talking heads felt that Penn State viewed their head coach position as more important than it actually is, they placed it fifth among teams in the Big Ten after Ohio State, Oregon, Michigan and USC. 

Luke Fickell
 He had a lot of sad expressions this season

There is a problem with transferability of coaches in sports. A good, if not very good coach at one place, is not necessarily successful with another place. Sometimes it has to do with academics, other times not a good fit with the culture of the program. When Luke Fickell came to Wisconsin he was proud of his passing attack, and hired an offensive coordinator who was to bring Air Longo (last name of the O-Coordinator was Longo) to the UW. He had many of the fans giddy to over the prospect of a passing oriented team. The passing game failed to live to expectations and Longo was fired last season. The culture at UW is with an emphasis on the running game, not a passing game, McIntosh seemed overly thrilled with the pass attack of Fickell. Brian Kelly's CEO approach as head coach did not fit with the SEC where they demand more of a hands-on head coach. Brett Bielema was a good coach at the UW, succeeding Barry Alvarez, but he lacked success at Arkansas of the SEC. He is finding some success with Illinois, another down program who had been coached by Lovie Smith for a while. Lovie had measured success with da Bears, but could not beat the Packers.

When WI started the season with middling wins against two middling teams (Middle Tennessee State as one) followed by six consecutive losses, many were calling for Luke's head. The UW has stuck with him for another year, perhaps because of the large buyout clause in effect. As one former head coach, Urban Meyer, said, WI lacks the money for that large of a buyout. The contract was on McIntosh, who if they fire Fickell this coming season should also be fired. I think that McIntosh firing Luke Fickell would be an admittance that he failed in his first major hire as UW AD. 

Chris McIntosh (2024)
UW Athletic Director

The larger issue is the change in college athletics over the past few years--Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL), have colleges paying players. For example, it is rumored that THE Ohio State paid over $20 million for certain players last season, when they won the National Foot ball College Championship. With NFL first contract players not earning as much as veterans, by the fact that veterans negotiate the collective bargaining agreement, some may make more in college ball than first years of the NFL. College programs now have people that all they do is look for free agent transfers. It used to be an athlete sat out a year, but no more. Programs can now bid, that is pay, for their services. Yet, football games are still won and lost on the field.

We don't know what will happen at the UW next season, they did end the season with a loss to Minnesota, but at home near the end of the season beat two ranked teams Washington and Illinois, with a loss to Indiana sandwiched between. They played Oregon well, as they did last year, but are not able to compete with top 10 teams a full four quarters. 

The game of football has changed a great deal from when my dad played at Marquette, which included playing in the first Cotton Bowl. When the Marquette team traveled to Dallas, it was by train, and no practice field was provided down in Texas, or on the way down, for them, but they were fortunate to find a farmer who had a pasture in which they could practice. Yet, one thing seldom talked about is how the game is played, and certain fundamentals make or break the play. Some men are so good they rely on their athleticism, but will tackle or block poorly. My brother Steve, who coached high school ball for many years said that the best fundamentals he learned were from my Dad who played, and learned football at Campion and Marquette in the 1930's. That is a testament to the way football was played. 

1936 Marquette Football Team, played in 1937 Cotton Bowl
My dad is front row, fourth from left

The best coaches, in my mind are those that take the three and some four star recruits and make them compete with the teams with higher ranked recruits. The success of Alabama was not so much Nick Saban, as perhaps all the five star recruits he was able to get. Curt Cignetti is likely the best coach in college football right now haven taken a low level Indiana team to one of the best teams in the nation in a short time span. What I do know is that the changes in college football have made it open season on coaches, perhaps more than bucks.




Wednesday, December 3, 2025

Agricultural Congruence, the Immigrant

The Hovel family followed the history of the United States and its socio-economic changes with the decline of human power in farming (and other industries) and the move to the specialization of labor which started in the late 19th century. I refer to this as agricultural congruence. Of the nine children born to my parents who lived to adulthood one farmed, one was a builder, and the others were mainly in varied professional, education, and managerial/administrative endeavors. The Hovel family was swept up in the waves of history, following its crests and troughs, which mark good and not so good points. Martin Hovel (Havel), my great grandfather, arrived in the US in with his parents and siblings in July 1868. He established his own farm on the unbroken plains of north central Iowa on land he purchased in Dec 1877, a few months after making his way west from Wisconsin. His son Rudy, my grandfather, bought that farm and then moved to Sun Prairie in 1930. An earlier post focused on Martin and Rudy, but this post will focus on Martin's father, Joseph (Josef) with a look at the congruence and dissidence to which Josef and his wife Anna and children their family from immigration and setting up a farm in the New World. 

Josef Havel transcribed and translated birth certificate, 1808
Completed for author by Richard D'Amelio

The Havel family emigrated from southwestern Bohemia to the United States by departing Bremen, Germany and they arrived at the Port of Baltimore on July 18, 1868. They were part of the large wave of immigrants, mainly from from Europe to the United States. Bohemia, was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in which the formal language and education was in German. In varied US Census records we have them reported as from Germany or from Austria. The family's hometown at time of immigration was Dolni Chrastany, which was part of the German ethnic settlement of Bohemia often referred to as the Sudetenland. The Sudetenland became famous with the Munich Accords in the fall of 1938 when Britain allowed Germany to take over the area without so much a consult with its then home country Czechoslovakia. The Havel family ancestral village, as far back as can be traced, however, is not part of the Sudetenland, even though it is closer to the German border than Dolni Chrastany. That village is Ratiborova Lhota. By 1870, almost 13 percent of the US population was foreign born, the peak of near 15% would be reached in 1890. The Hovel family was part of a move of 30 million persons that departed Europe in a 100 year period between 1815 and 1915. First from nations that identified as White Anglo-Saxon Protestant, to later migrants being Slavs from Eastern Europe and Catholics from southern Europe. It was a diaspora of people seeking a better life for themselves and their family. The influx of Irish and Catholic immigrants led to the Know-Nothing Party and even violent activities against the immigrant groups.

To Help with the Ancestry
Hovel Line

All told, one family member, Catherine Hovel Popp recalled a journey of over 16 weeks for the family. They departed Dolni Chrastany, went to Bremen Germany, departed Bremen, arrived in Baltimore, left Baltimore and arrived at Jefferson, WI. The family sailed on the ship Baltimore which was inaugurated on March 1, 1868, so they travelled on a new ship, but yet one better than the Titanic which sunk in the North Atlantic 44 years after the Havel voyage. In 1870, The German Lloyd line ships averaged the  transatlantic crossing from Bremen to Baltimore in 11 days and 13 hours, one way. While cost is not necessarily precise, some have estimated the journey to be about $30 per person in 1868 for steerage, or about $685 in today's dollars. Hence, the ten Havel family members from 60 year old Josef to infant Wenzel cost about $6,850 in today's currency. Not a small amount today, and probably an even greater amount to the family.

SS Baltimore Passenger Log, Left bracket marks Havel Line
Arrival at Baltimore, MD, 18 Jul l868      

It did not take them long to get back to farming. Less than ten days after disembarking in Baltimore, Josef Hovel had purchased an 80 acre farm between Jefferson and Fort Atkinson for $3,000 from William Behrend and his wife. A few weeks later, on August 9, they sold had sold their farm in Dolni Chrastany to Johann Reindl and his wife for 5,000 flö.W.(österreichischer Währung/ Austrian Gulden currency), which in a roundabout, but not necessarily correct calculation, equates to about $4,000 in 1868. It likely included the meager farm supplies, as they would depart with few household belongings. The benefit of the US was land to be had at lower price. The approximate 45 acre Dolni Chrastany farm sale value would be about $89/acre, while the farm near Jefferson would be $37.50/acre. 

Josef Havel Immigration Arrival Form

The family migration in 1868 is an example of chain migration. First, they came as a family, and second, a person from the home village already lived in the Jefferson area. Jakob Fitzl from the same Bohemian village had arrived in this area in late fall in 1866. The oldest Havel daughter, Anna, was born in 1848, and would marry Jakob in 1869 at St John the Baptist Catholic Church in Jefferson. It turns out they were second cousins. Jakob's grandmother was Marie Havel Fitzl, Joseph's aunt a sister to Josef's father, Frantisek. (We will meet up with Wenzel Fitzl again, who seemingly had a proclivity to marry widows.) While many commentators place political or religious measures as the means for migration, I believe it was purely economic for the Havel family. Economic opportunity for the children to start their own farms on the plentiful land in the US would have been easier to accomplish than to find a farm for the children in the poor soils of the old country. The children ranged in age from less than 10 months of age to 21 years of age at time of arrival in Baltimore.  All of the children were married in the US. All eight of the children would at some point would farm. One child born in Bohemia in July 1853 died less than seven months later. One son of Josef and Anna Havel would move from farming into other endeavors, not successfully, which in part led to a tragedy, which I storied in 2017

Farming was the chosen occupation of the Havel (Hovel came into use later in time by two sons, Martin and John), and the expansive land in the US would have drawn them as it did many other immigrants. The search for good and available farmland took all but one daughter to northcentral Iowa. The daughter who remained in Wisconsin was Rose who had married a man from the Jefferson area, George Kachel; they acquired Josef's farm in 1882 for $3,000, plus $200 of debt in March 1882. The sale price included all farm equipment and all but a few pieces of household furnishings, a downsizing methodology that involves little effort. The Kachel family would later sell this farm and move to a farm just west of Whitewater, WI. 

Joseph Havel Farm between Jefferson and Ft Atkinson, WI
1872 Plat Map (Identified as Haffell on the plat map)

Josef passed away at aged 74 in Sept 1882. The 1885 Iowa Census shows his wife Anna and the youngest son, Wenzel (b Sep 1867) living with  daughter/sibling Marie Havel Hofmeister and her husband Anton. The Hofmeister family lived and farmed in Union Township, Worth Co, south of Manly at the time. Also farming in Union Township was John Hovel and his family and Jakub and Anna Havel Fitzl, as was Joseph and his wife who would later move a bit south to adjoining Cerro Gordo Co, and then move to Minnesota. Martin was in nearby Lincoln Township. One daughter, Katherine, married Emil Popp and farmed to the east of Worth County in Mitchell County. 

The Havel family arrived in the US while the nation was in the throes of reconstruction from the Civil War. It was also five years before the major 1873 recession. Josef farmed his acreage in Jefferson, with the respective agricultural census records reported that he tilled 35 acres tilled in 1870 (which would be land tilled in 1869) and 50 acres tilled in 1880 (which would be tilled land in 1879). Oats, rye, Indian corn, and wheat were the main grains grown, but he also grew a good number of potatoes. He had three milk cows from which he made 300 pounds of butter in 1880. Three milk cows were reported in 1870 but with a production of 90 lbs of butter. He has two horses. He raised a few swine in both years, and reported a similar value of livestock for both census'--about $400. While Josef was growing wheat, the pesky cinch bug became prevalent in Wisconsin. It was this pest which led Wisconsin from one of the top wheat producing states to become the dairy state. Here again, a diversified operation may have been helpful to the small farmer at a time when agriculture was about to dramatically change as explained in the first post.

Josef Havel Declaration for Citizenship, 2 Nov 1869

Josef began his farming career in the foothills of the Bohemian Mountains in the Village of Dolni Chrastany. Plots of land were often scattered, and were generally long narrow strips. In the US he had one large contiguous piece of land. Hence, the simple act of cultivation was completely different for him in the US, than what he had in Bohemia. Further, the foothills of the mountains were notorious for  poor soil. Even with conservation practices the years of cultivation would have depleted the soil, and such soil would lack the natural fertility of what the family would find in the fertile prairies of the Midwest, particularly the virgin prairie soil farmed in Iowa which Martin farmed. In Bohemia, the agricultural settlements were in small villages. Each farm home would have a small garden area and generally an courtyard with house on one side and outbuildings surrounding. In many places there was a village herder who watched the livestock, and a person would also watch the fowl out prancing around the village pond. I certainly hope such pond was not used for drinking water. 

Joseph and his family would have experienced some culture shock in the transformation from the backwater of Southwest Bohemia to the US. New language and customs, different methods of farming, more travel to basic items like a blacksmith. No wonder, many recent immigrants congregated with persons of similar nature in which they established ethnic enclaves whether in cities or in rural areas. Jefferson, WI was settled by many Germans, and the Havel family would have felt at home at least language wise, and perhaps with some customs. One can also think of the Lanskroner Bohemians (Eastern Bohemians who were mostly ethnic Germans in the Sudetenland) who settled first in the in the Waterloo area to Watertown, and later spread west to Sun Prairie (along the Hwy 19 corridor), sharing language and customs with the German population of Watertown. Growing up in Sun Prairie, the city was home to many surnames from the Landskron region: Motl, Skalitzky, Blaska, Freidel, Langer, Schuster, Benisch just to name a few, The Duscheck family who was from the Landskron region, Martin's spouse was Amelia Duscheck, is a prime example, first settling in Jefferson County southwest of Watertown and later moving to a farm just northeast of Sun Prairie. 

Joseph Grave Marker, Bohemian Catholic Cemetery
Plymouth, IA (Findagrave)

I have to think that the simple act of travel from Baltimore to Chicago and then likely to Milwaukee would have given my Havel ancestors a view of the immense size and variety of cultures and geography of which America was comprised. They would have experienced the miasma of humanity on the ship and particularly at port where many varied cultures and languages collided. On their way to Wisconsin, they would have traveled through cities that comprised the burgeoning industrial heartland of the US (and later become the noted Rustbelt); their arrival in Chicago, may have taken them past the massive stockyards which had been established in 1865. Martin likely speculated that his grandson, Roy would marry a woman from Chicago whose paternal grandfather left the mines of rural Pennsylvania and worked in the stockyards of Chicago in about 1900. The broad expanse of the Iowa prairies would have been daunting to Joseph and the older children who were used to being encapsulated by the rolling hills and forests of Southwest Bohemia. All but one of the eight Havel children, at some point in their lives, farmed the rich prairie soil of northern Iowa. The youngest, Wenzel first farmed in Iowa's Mitchell County before moving just across the border to Mower Co, MN. The one who did not move to Iowa farmed in Wisconsin The sheer sense of scale would have been daunting to Josef who perhaps wondered what he was getting himself into.

Deed from Behrend to Joseph Havel
17 Jul 1868, Jefferson Co Courthouse

I wonder if Joseph realized how much the decision he and his wife made affected the lives of their descendants? Their move allowed his descendants to advance in chosen fields, avoid being under Nazi and later Communist suppression. Although, I am sure some people in Fitchburg thought I may have well been a planner in the Eastern bloc. As I have long said, if the Fitchburg Days Festival had a dunk tank and I was in it, the line would have been long. 

Up next, on Agricultural Congruence I will look at the taxing and tedious time and incongruent aspects of agriculture and peasant life in in the Old Country. For peasant serfs it was an era of great difficulty with most of the known history of the family spanning much of the second serfdom. Serfdom was in effect for most all generations of the Havel family until 1848, although some restrictions were lessened in the latter part of the 18th century. My peasant serf ancestors were not dominated not so much by the Hapsburg Crown, but by the Lords of the Domain, the seigneurs, and their overseers, the wealthy absentee landlords who demanded much and gave nothing in return. It was just above slavery on the economic ladder. The family owned a farm for several generations in Ratiborova Lhota, under the Krumlov domain. Most famous of the Krumlov domain is the city Cesky Krumlov which is a United Nations World Heritage Site. The robot labor of the Havel family helped give the domain its wealth to build and maintain such a city.

Wednesday, November 26, 2025

Agricultural Congruence, the Fertile Prairies

My father was born in 1918, an era markedly different from the one in which we now live. He was born in the family farm house southeast of Manly, Iowa near a small town established about 40 years prior to his birth. His father Rudy, purchased the land from his father (My dad's grandfather) Martin. Martin was born in 1850 in Bohemia, and his paternal line as far back as can be traced, to mid 1500's, were peasant-serf farmers. This post (and a later post) is about the congruity of the Hovel family in agriculture to the socioeconomic and cultural trends at the time. This post will concentrate on the congruity of agriculture regarding my grandfather, Rudy Hovel and his father Martin Hovel who farmed the fertile prairies of Iowa and southern Wisconsin.

Rudy, and Ida with son Roy 

These posts, instead of going from past to more recent will go from more recent to past. One aspect of congruence is the adoption of new agricultural techniques. When my grandfather prepared to move from the farm he purchased from his father, Martin in Manly, IA, to Sun Prairie, WI  he held an auction. This  December 1929 auction included much farm equipment, animals and some household items. He took some items with him, as a news report indicates that Rudy rode on the train to Sun Prairie with his load of items. He had a diversity of milking cows, including Red Milking Shorthorns, Roan Northern, and black milk cows. It was a diverse group of cows. My brother Mike, who was a dairy farmer himself made this comment via email when I inquired of the diverse animal group: 
The herd of milking cows is quite diverse and I wouldn't doubt that Rudy was crossbreeding animals much like some farms are today to get more vigor as  opposed to strictly purebreds witch would have a "limited gene pool".. would suspect he had good test weights with such a mix of cows.. no small feat to feed that number of cattle , sheep and pigs plus the 50 hens !! (Author note: beyond milk cows he had many head of beef cattle.)
Auction notice, Dec 5, 1912 Manly Signal

Rudy was farming in an era of significant technological innovation, particularly in terms of equipment, and power. His auction included varied equipment, but it is difficult for me to tell which was horse vs tractor pulled, if it mattered. I have written before about changes in farming during that crucial era. At a broad scale, the mechanized and technological changes in agriculture can best be represented by persons employed in agriculture in the United States as shown in the following table: 


Rudy purchased the home farm of about 80 acres and an additional 42 acres from his father in December 1912 for $8,400. Rudy grew the operation as evidenced between the Iowa 1915 census to what is recorded for his 1929 auction sale. In 1915 he reported as having 11 milk cows, an additional eight calves less than one year old, and five steer of varied ages. But, he also had 160 fowl and four pigs. In total his 1929 auction included over 64 large animals, including 54 head of cattle, as well as 50 chickens. Showing the older method of farming, in 1915 Rudy had five horses and one colt. Technology likely helped him grow and harvest the feed for his expanding livestock based farm. Farm advancement was taking hold and production was increasing during this era. 

Lower part of auction notice

As the Gilded age took hold after 1865, and the end of the Civil War, and within a few years the nation began its rapid industrialization, and this can be seen in the continued reduction in persons employed in agriculture. In its place, the specialization of labor started to take hold as accounts, teachers, lawyers, and other managerial and professional classes advanced the nation. The change to an increasing specialized economy also required education. The below graph shows years percent of high school graduates, percent who attended college and the percent illiterate:


My grandfather, born in 1887, was in high school through 10 grade. Realizing the importance of education, he and his wife, Ida, sent their two children to private boarding high schools in Prairie du Chien. My dad was born in September 1918 and graduated from high school in spring 1935. He then graduated from Marquette University in 1939 and followed that with Law School at the University of Wisconsin matriculating in 194. A couple months later he began his service in WWII.
Roy with his parents, graduation
Likely Campion High School 

My mom and dad had nine children that lived into adulthood, with Mike being the farmer, one a builder, and the others involved in a variety of professions: teachers, lawyer, dentist, accountant, manager/administrator. The Hovel family was part of the congruence with larger societal trends of movement to specialization in occupations. It mirrors the outcomes of the national socio-economic culture.

While the industrial revolution began in the late 18th century in the United States, certain inventions, think if the steel plow in 1837, were crucial to breaking the prairie sod of the Midwest, it took time and of course money for farms to afford such equipment. 

My great grandfather, Martin and his wife Amelia purchased his first 80 acres of land southeast of Manly, IA from a man named Joseph Brohm who was an absentee owner. The purchase of the 80 acres cost Martin and Amelia $970.00 with the purchase signed on Dec 21, 1877, or eighty years to the date prior to the birth of my twin brother. The deed was recorded the following month. News accounts seem to indicate that Martin broke the sod and established his farm. It is said he hauled rock for the house foundation, and Amelia helped lay the rock. One account, from 1976, indicates they moved to a farm 1.5 miles southeast of Manly in the fall of 1877. I suppose it is possible he was renting the land until the purchase was finalized. This would be the home in which both my grandpa and my dad would be born. Martin likely had a steel plow. It would take time to break the prairie sod. His purchase in late 1877 left two years to break the sod and the 1880 US Agriculture census he reported having tilled 45 acres in 1879 (reported 1880). Martin had only one milk cow, with six pigs, and 25 barnyard poultry from which he produced 60 dozen eggs. His main crops were Indian corn, oats and wheat, although her harvested 30 bushels of Irish potatoes from 1/8th of an acre. Having learned to use oxen in the old country, he had one ox and two horses.

Martin Hovel Family, c1893
Rudy is to left

In the US census, Martin and Amelia are reported as literate. Martin was born in Bohemia, but Amelia was born to immigrant parents in the town of Milford, Jefferson Co. The only item I have of a great grandfather is a book in German owned by Martin in the extraordinarily difficult to read Kurrent script. The book is dated 1890, so it was acquired while he was in the US. I am sure he spoke English, but this shows German may well have been his language of choice. In a dissonance to the common culture, Martin and Amelia, as well as their children were Roman Catholic. While Bohemians did not have the same level of animus expressed to them as the Irish, they still likely felt some discrimination.

 A brother recalls Rudy, and his brother Ed discussing the KKK activity that occurred in Iowa, popularized in the Netflix  show Damnation. The advance of the second KKK in Iowa may have been one reason why Rudy migrated to Sun Prairie. He and Ida were very devote, with their first date to Vespers. KKK members were known to have taken control of the Manly school board. Today as then, Manly continues to be the only community in Worth County with a Catholic Church, which shows the domination of Protestants. The KKK certainly caused turbulence in the nation, and it may have done so for my grandparents. I also tend to think issues and actions related to KKK action were underreported given the number of middle class merchants, news, and in some places police and sheriffs were involved with the KKK. 

Turbulence in the socio-economic portion of society was seen in more than just the KKK. The rapid industrialization of the nation (which began in 1870) was the lead cause of a rural to urban migration as specialization took hold in the realm of business and government. It was followed by the Great War which would yield to the farm depression of the early 1920's, and later the better known Great Depression would arrive. Internationally, starting in 1939, the world would be amazed at the speed of the German blitzkrieg, and with concern over Germany's desire for domination. Grandpa Rudy helped organize a peace rally held at St Joseph's Church in East Bristol in Sept 1939. United States entry into World War II would forever change the map of the world. For all the political upheaval, there was also tension caused by greater mechanization in farming and life in general. 

Martin and Amelia

Historian John L. Shover, in his work First Majority-Last Minority, an agricultural history over time in the United States, comments that farms of this era, particularly in the Midwest, were "diversified units producing a little bit of most everything to meet the family's subsistence requirements, with a little surplus left over for cash marketing." Given the US Census Agricultural schedules reviewed in 1870 and 1880, the Iowa 1915 census and the 1929 auction items, Rudy followed a the standard diversification of what is today a small farm.  A practice today that is highly thought of and which form pleasant nostalgic stories if not memories emanate. I believe, the diversification was necessary, as large profits were not the norm. Diversification would not be putting all your eggs in one basket, and would be a hedge against disease or weather. In fact if one looks at the writings of Agricultural Economist, Curtis Stadtfeld, who was a generation younger than my father, but wrote about his parents livelihood on the Michigan farm on which he was raised, one gets a different take of the melancholic view often described today for that era of farming. Just one example of Stadtfield, who grew up on a farm in the Midwest can suffice:
In fact, the barn was never painted at all. The good potato crop never came. It always rained too little to make good beans, or too much to harvest them. We never had so many heifer calves that the herd grew large and made us wealthy. We were always just getting by. And then came the war [reference to WWII], and so many things were pulled apart that were never put back together again. The fabric of that life tore, and we looked back from the other side of the rent and wondered how it ever worked in the first place how it ever held together.
This shows that sustenance of the family came first, and hence diversification was necessary to provide the meat, dairy, eggs, and other products common to living. A garden would have also raised vegetables with food preserved through canning, or in root cellars. Specialization would have meant dependence on one or two crops or animals, and with no diversity a failure in one could have been catastrophic to family well being. The move to dairy in Wisconsin occurred, in part, due the cinch bug having become problematic for the wheat crop. I surmise that Rudy, who was a very hard worker, was generally successful, and that his farm was not in the dire situation noted by Shover. Rudy continued to own his Iowa farm for twelve years after moving to Wisconsin, selling it in 1942. He purchased his Sun Prairie farm on March 4, 1929, seven months the Great Depression would occur. Yet, he did not move to teh farm until January of 1930. Rudy's skill, tenacity and perseverance, along with diversification likely helped him and his family survive through such difficult times. 

Rudy Hovel Farm, near Manly, IA 1913
42 acres north of road and original 80 acres south of road

Life on the farm was never easy. Tilling at a time of pre-tractor would have been not only time consuming, but hard work behind a horse drawn plow. Of all the work, tilling of the land for corn and other related row crops was, as reported by Shover, the most difficult chore. Shover referred to the work as: "a stern regime of daily tasks and unyielding seasonal requirements" which determined the pace of activity.

Rudy also benefitted from earnings of stock in then growing companies. His investments included Standard Oil, Maytag, Montgomery Ward and Sears, among others. He benefitted by the industrialization of the nation in both farming and with stock, likely on the belief he could be left behind.
Rudy's Sun Prairie, WI Farm, 1937 air photo

The Hovel family mirrored the economic changes of the time. It moved as advancements were made in farming, whether equipment or breeding. We can see then, that from 1880 to 1915 and then to 1929 there was a great increase in what was able to accomplish in growth of livestock and likely income on the Hovel farm fist owned by Martin and then taken over by Rudy. Rudy undertook an additional purchase of land from his father near the home farm, first joint with his brother in 1917 whom he later bought out in 1922. Martin and Amelia would retire from farming and finish out their years at a house in Manly, IA, purchased from a family friend. The house would stay in the family for decades. After Amelia's wake, the candles were still burning when some temporary tenants moved in until later occupied by a member of the Joseph Hovell (Martin's brother, wo added an additional L) family.

My dad was in the professional class, breaking my direct line with farming, although my brother Mike carried on agriculture until his retirement from dairy farming. The family was congruent with the national activity. 

The next post will explore how the Hovel family congruence in immigration, followed by a third post about duties and obligations imposed and altered during their stay in the old world. Bohemia. It is a chapter of extreme toil of their work as peasants and serfs, with little advancement in techniques or methods of agriculture during most all of that time frame. The world is much different now than when my father was born 107 years ago, and in the world in which he grew up and served his country in WWII. The Hovel family, now seeing some of my dad's great grandchildren enter the workforce, has continued to follow the waves of history as we move into the second quarter of the 21st century.