A couple months ago, Apple introduced it I-phone X, not 10, but X. Far be it for a person with a flip phone to
make comments about a smart phone, but bear with me. When the I-phone X came out there were
articles about how it really was not all that much different from earlier
versions of the phone, and people should not waste their hard earned
money. More recently I saw that the
I-phone X was selling quite well. Although on Monday, November 13, 2017 a news
report noted that the I-phone 7 was the bestselling I-phone in the 3rd
quarter of the year. The X was not
introduced until later in September. Thus, it seems that people want the newest
which is often thought of as the best version.
In the computing world one only needs to look at Microsoft’s Vista
operating system to realize newer is not better. Is the I-phone X that much better than
number 7? Or, for that matter, a
Samsung, a Moto, or any of the other similar devices?
Devices such as the I-pad are now ubiquitous in American
Households, and so is the I-phone in American pockets. Pope Francis recently commented about the
number of cell phones being used while he is celebrating mass, and he suggested
that people turn more to Jesus and God, than use their cell phone. In 2013 I visited the Church of the Nativity, and there
were many persons, particularly Asians, who were taking photos using an I-pad. It was not the photo taking that was
annoying, but rather the jockeying for
position by people concentrating on and what is in its camera view rather than
the people they bumped. And, let's face it, a 9+" I-Pad is much larger than a point and shoot camera. Yet, the whole
photo thing is understandable. People
wish to post a photo of events on social
media showing that they were part of something larger; something that may
someday viewed as historic. At the birth place of Christ, all wanted a photo to commemorate the event. People are
said to be social animals and this practice certainly plays to that argument.
Yet, the paradox of the social nature of people is the way
we choose to live and transport ourselves.
The American dream still consists of a single family home, often in the
country, with your own nice Toyota. This
is as American as apple pie and Toyota (the latter is really not very American,
but shows how the country has changed). Varied technology and car companies are
working on the self-driving car. Our
quest for privacy in the outer regions of exurbia has taken us from where a
drive was leisurely, to now where it is a chore. My dad had only but travel a few blocks to
work (often walking). Today many commutes are 30 minutes or more, with the average, nation wide, being almost 26 minutes. Years ago my mom and dad would go for a
leisurely ride during a Sunday afternoon, most likely to get away from my older
and younger siblings. John Nolen Drive in Madison came
about in part due to a leisure drive association. So did many of the Parkways in New York City. John Nolen can now be a frantic drive, particularly
during commuting times and UW football games.
Self-driving cares may reduce stress, but will they reduce
traffic? It will take years for all
persons to drive an autonomous vehicle, and so there will still be humans
driving on the road for quite some time.
People are not like storm troopers who can be tuned to one cadence with
a meticulously planned spacing. Some say
the self-driving car will allow a person to be dropped off at work, and then the car can travel home to avoid needing to park in an expensive downtown location. (But, perhaps the expense of downtown parking will decrease as demand shrivels.). It can then retrieve the person later in the
day. This adds two more trips to the
road system. They could also lead to
more exurban sprawl as persons decide they can work in the vehicle while they
get driven to their place of employment.
The paradox is that while people are social animals they also seek
privacy. Another paradox is that as more
people move to exurbia and the pastoral lands, the land becomes more developed,
ruining the reason why they move there in the first place. It seems a not too often occurrence that we
degrade that which we value.
Social media is replacing face to face contact. As technology with self-driving cars and even
robotics increase will we see a day when little human contact occurs. There
is even talk of robots replacing human partners. My wife would probably say a robot would be
more talkative than I. It probably also
would not touch her cheek with a cold aluminum finger. My cold human hand, just cannot be replaced. Technology has changed the way we interact
and communicate, and the way we work. Will
it continue to drive market demand to the point that humans really don’t know
what they got themselves into?
No comments:
Post a Comment